One of the recurring themes here at Poli-Tea is the two-party system's inability to represent the many people whose political interests are not accounted for by the duopoly machine, with a focus on independent and third party voters. However, the limitations of the duopoly form are that much more apparent in the system's failure to adequately represent the interests of even avowed Republicans and Democrats. The result, of course, is widespread protest. However, in a kind of trickle down political economy, ideological divisions among political elites structure the partisan resentments of the politicized masses. Conservative Republicans did not rally against the massive expansion of government powers and trillion dollar expenditures under the Bush administration. Similarly, liberal Democrats ceased mass protests against the warfare state once it came under the control of their favored party. I have argued before that lesser-evilism is one of the primary practical expressions of political negativity in the US, but the reactionary character of mainstream politics under the conditions of the two-party state may be most apparent in the propaganda techniques of American protest groups. Godwin's Law supplies the principle. A more or less random sampling of protest art from around the web:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Better still, each side accuses the other of hypocrisy, one party claiming that the other opposes certain policies only when practiced by the enemy party. Republicans seem especially fond of this argument, but I expect Democrats to make it more often over the next three years. Naturally, each party acts as if it has an unbroken record of consistent principled conduct. You know what they say about motes and beams....
Indeed. Or perhaps we'll see a new twist on a related adage: if thy neighbor's eye offend thee . . .
Maybe this is one of thse situations where they're both right!
Post a Comment