skip to main  |
      skip to sidebar
          
        
          
        
From this week's 
column at CAIVN:
California's top two open primary system is facing a legal challenge from an  Independent activist affiliated with the Coffee Party movement.  On  February 17th, former State Senate candidate Michael Chamness   filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking an injunction against the   implementation of the top two open primary in the upcoming special  election  to replace Congresswoman Jane Harman in California’s 36th  Congressional  District.  Harman announced her retirement from the  office on Monday,  triggering a special election to fill the seat. 
A  non-profit consultant and Coffee Party activist, Chamness  was a candidate in the special primary election for  State Senate  District 28 last month, one of the first elections to be  held under the  top-two system in California.  Because Chamness is not  affiliated with a  ballot-qualified party, the legal scaffolding for the  top two open primary  system – namely SB 6 – prohibited him from  stating his party preference  on the ballot, nor was he permitted to  identify himself as an  Independent, as would have been the case under  the old primary system.   Instead, he was listed on the ballot as having  “No Party Preference.” . . . 
As  he intends to run in the primary race for CD 36, the lawsuit seeks a   preliminary injunction blocking the implementation of SB 6 in that   election on the grounds that Chamness has already been forced “to lie to   voters about his political views” and would be made to do so again if  he  must state on the ballot that he has “no party preference.” . . . 
The  suit names California Secretary of State Debra Bowen and   Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk of Los Angeles Dean Logan as defendants.    Coincidentally, Chamness and Bowen will also face off in the primary   election for CD 36.  Bowen has already officially declared her  candidacy for the House seat being vacated by Jane Harman.  As the   complaint points out, Bowen will seemingly benefit from what some view  as a double standard  established in SB 6:  while she will be allowed to  state her particular  party preference on the ballot, Chamness will be  prohibited from doing  so [Emphasis added.] . . . 
Read the whole thing.
 
 
          
      
 
  
 
 
  
 
1 comment:
Thanks for running this story.
Post a Comment