tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5016245466912407364.post7518282578489705315..comments2024-01-06T17:38:53.551-05:00Comments on Poli-Tea: Cordoba House as Political Rorschach Testd.erishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09186054212519025557noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5016245466912407364.post-56469755217649754642010-08-30T14:02:00.510-04:002010-08-30T14:02:00.510-04:00imo, having a right vs. being right is not the iss...imo, having a right vs. being right is not the issue here. Having the right to x presupposes that you are allowed to x. To admit there is a right to x, but to say it shouldn't be allowed is tantamount to denying the right.d.erisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5016245466912407364.post-49667299323358523232010-08-30T00:35:15.985-04:002010-08-30T00:35:15.985-04:00___
the American public appears to have conflictin...___<br />the American public appears to have conflicting, if not contradictory, views on the issues involved . . . Paradoxically, then, 62% agree that the group has a right to build the center, but only 34% agree they should be allowed to build it <br />----<br /><br />That's probably because many folks sort of get it intuitively that having a right to do something and actually being right toCranky Critterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05509666202091121125noreply@blogger.com